Righting a Rolling Stones Catalogue Wrong: The New Rolling Stones "Studio Album Collection 1971-2016" Box Set

The irony wasn't lost on Stones fans when ABKCO and Universal simultaneously issued Rolling Stones vinyl box sets back in 2010. ABKCO, which owned the group's British Decca-era catalog, hired legendary mastering engineer Bob Ludwig to handle mastering of its catalog while Universal, which controlled the group's own label, released a box set with no mastering credits.

The history of the ABKCO box is well documented as covered in the two box sets' musicangle.com review, which now appears on analogPlanet.com: "To go back to the early 2000s: restoration producer Jody Klein assembled a team on both side of the Atlantic to research analog tapes and oversee the transfers. Steve Rosenthal at The Magic Shop oversaw the restoration and archiving while Teri Landi oversaw the archival research and the actual A/D conversions. Bob Ludwig did the mastering, while Gus Skinas—a name familiar to SACD enthusiasts—was the DSD engineer. During the original archiving all “electronically reprocessed for stereo” tracks were removed from the catalog and a few stereo mixes that had never before been officially released replaced them. The rest appeared in the original mono."

Those files were used for the original ABKCO SACDs (now sadly out of print) and LPs mastered by Don Grossinger via PCM converted files at Europadisc. According to ABKCO archivist Teri Landi the 2010 box set was sourced using those same DSD files converted to 192k/32 bit and 192/24 bit WAV files (she didn’t say why two bit rates were utilized) using Weiss Sarcon conversion software. The files were sent to GZ Digital Media in the Czech Republic, which cut DMM and pressed the 180g vinyl. For the UMG (now UMe) box no information was provided, thus the irony. Plus, while the equalization was reasonably accurate to the original LPs, that box sounded squashed and the file used for Exile on Main St. was the same absurdly squashed one used for the 40th annivesary box set edition of that record.

All that has changed for this new box set, though it too has been cut from digital sources. The big difference is that we know who cut and from what sources, which is very useful information. Here Miles Showell at Abbey Road Studios was given a hard drive containing high resolution flat transfer files of all 15 albums. Showell, a fan of the late Stan Ricker, uses a carefully restored lathe and cuts at 1/2 speed. How that's accurately accomplished in the digital domain would make an interesting story!

Showell was kind of enough to send this email to an enquiring individual who was kind enough to forward it to me:
"While I was not granted access to the original master tapes (some of which are getting pretty worn and should be used as little as possible to prevent further damage) I was loaned an archive hard disk by the management. On this disk were two separate sets of high resolution flat transfers from the master tapes for each album where the source was analogue tape (two or three of the later albums are digital recordings and these were digitally dubbed at their original sample rate to the hard disk). The two archive transfers were DSD and also 24 bit 192 kHz PCM (a few were 24 bit 176.4 kHz).

"I was told to listen to both and choose whichever one I felt was the best to use. In most cases the DSD transfer won, but not always. Once I had chosen, I was given free range to just ‘do my thing’ which was remarkable freedom. I had no instructions from the band’s management or from Universal other than to do it as well as I could.

At no point was any digital peak limiting applied to these albums as this is never good for audiophile releases and is completely useless as a source for vinyl records (full scale digital audio is too loud to cut from, so it is pointless to smash it against the brick wall only to drop the level still further for the cut. Adding limiting would have been the worst of all worlds, increased distortion and “mush” with no level increase). On some songs I did apply some gentle tube compression (I have an analogue tube AT-101, which is a very faithful Fairchild 670 recreation, it sounds wonderful, almost certainly because of the 22 tubes in it). This compression was for artistic effect and feel and not to over hype the music and make it too pumped. I am no fan of extreme compression but like salt and pepper in cooking, a little bit carefully applied at the right time in the right quantity can really improve things.

"I was also loaned a set of original pressings for every album which was an excellent reference point as I could play these on the calibrated system on the lathe while also listening to the files. My goal was to make these new cuts at least as good as the originals and hopefully better. This is not as easy as it sounds due to the wear on some of the tapes.

"Essentially, for the original cuts, the tapes were obviously in mint condition which is a huge advantage for the original pressings, but I have a far cleaner signal path than was available to the original cutting engineers which helped me. I am happy that I achieved my goal. Management and Universal did not listen to anything until the test pressing stage when the decision was taken to proceed, thankfully the feedback was good (had they not liked it, the box would almost certainly not be happening).

I hope all of the above answers your question and if you get a box that you are pleased with it. Just so you know, the latest album in the set was not remastered but all of the others have been worked on by me." (Blue and Lonesome was pressed using the original metal parts).

Now, what more could you ask for than that kind of refreshing honesty coming directly from the mastering engineer himself? Well you'd probably want a beautifully presented box with carefully produced album jackets and maybe a download card for all of the files at CD and MP3 resolution ("maybe" because the set I was loaned did not included it. It's supposed to be on a small card that I couldn't find ). All of these elements are part of this superbly produced, well-documented box set.

Oh, and you'd also want the records to be well-pressed. I received a sealed box to review so no special set (it is box No. 00061). I've heard plenty of grousing about new pressing quality. This set, pressed at MPO in France contained a box of 18 perfectly pressed, perfectly flat records. MPO, which is a "veteran" pressing plant is now producing "world class" records.

There's no book and no big "hoopla" inside, just a well-produced series of reissued LPs in carefully produced jackets complete with the inserts found on the originals. The single insert card containing the production credits also includes useful information including that "...these sleeves have been created from the original release material therefore certain information re-created is no longer valid and have been recreated as replica pieces only." In other words, the jackets recreate the originals including a real working zipper on Sticky Fingers and no bar codes PTL!

You're even told that "While every attempt has been made to match materials and design of original releases in certain circumstances it has not been possible due to modern manufacturing techniques." Nonetheless the jackets are very well done (the removed photos of Lucille Ball, Jayne Mansfield and the others on Some Girls are still "censored"). BTW: if you've never seen the uncensored insert behind the die-cut cover, here it is (hope I don't get sued):

You will not feel as if you're been fobbed off with some haphazard jacket art. Even the outer box including a large die-cut Stones logo and an lenticular one that changes colors depending on the viewing angle looks and feels great!

Of course you want to know about the sound. Here's there's both great and not so great news. The great news is that these reissues finally have the originals' dynamic slam and punch (and some beat the originals). If you've suffered with the last and limp, squashed remastering of Exile...., you'll be in drunken/drugged out heaven with the Stones when they recorded this sloppy, debauched masterpiece as tax exiles in a Nelcote France Chateau.

When they'd finished in France, Mick flew to Los Angeles with the tapes to complete the overdubs at Sunset Sound in Los Angeles. Once the mix had been completed (a great mix that the rock critics of the era, foolishly labeled "muddy" because they were listening on junk turntables) Mick and probably Keith ran they over to Artisan Sound where the original lacquers were cut. So let's just say, if you have an original Artisan Sound mastered copy of Exile..... you have the best, but finally here's a reissue that does justice to that album. Let me prove it to you (or disprove it, depending upon what you hear) with two excerpts from "Tumbling Dice".

Perhaps its oxymoronic to present you with 96/24 files, one cut from an original all-analog record and one cut from an analog record sourced from a digital tape, but anyway, here you go, with neither file identified so you'll have to choose which you prefer "blind". BTW: I don't know what Miles Showell used to play back the records, but I used the Continuum Caliburn, fitted with the new SAT LM-09 arm (it's the "budget" model at $24,800) and Ortofon MC Century cartridge ($12,000). My original copy of Exile... has been played since 1972. So much for "record wear".

Tumbling Dice 1

Tumbling Dice 2

And as long as we're at this, here are two excerpts from Tatoo You one from the original mastered by Bob Ludwig at Masterdisk and one from the box:

Start Me Up 1

Start Me Up 2

(File identities will be revealed at a later date). Here's my sonic conclusion without being album-specific: Miles Showell has done a superb job given what he had to work from, which were digital transfers from tapes, some of which have heard better days, and original high resolution files from later digital recordings. Would we all have preferred that he cut from tape where it was originally so recorded? Yes. Is digital "transparent to the analog source"? HELL NO. That's one of the biggest crocks of sonic shit still being sold to the public. All of these transfers produce in the reissued LPs a slight "smoothing over" effect that reduces somewhat transient crispness and image solidity. So be assured that the transfer from the AAA LP loses something as well but the differences should be clear. The original of Undercover cut at Sterling Sound by the late George Marino just smokes the reissue, but without having the original, you'll surely enjoy the reissue. By the way: the originals during the Atlantic Records distribution days (after Sticky Fingers and Exile... were all mastered at Sterling Sound for both the American and U.K. editions as well as for Holland (for some reason the best sounding Some Girls is the orange vinyl Dutch edition mastered at Sterling).

These new records maintain the spirit of the originals and in some cases the careful mastering on a super-clean chain produces a somewhat different but equally valid and occasionally improved listening experience that even owners of originals might enjoy. You will find that the later albums in this set sound better than the originals, which were ridiculously squashed (Bridges to Babylon for instance is much better here than on the original). The bottom end Showell has engraved into these records will please even the most jaded analog fanatic. That said, if you own a set of original pressings (of the early albums in particular) you are all set. If not, finally here's a box worthy of The Rolling Stones on their own label. And if later, the label releases these individually, you might consider picking up the group's later output.

One thing I don't understand though: if the hard drive of flat transfers from the original tapes supplied to Mr. Showell is now considered the repository of the masters and is essentially the masters, of what value to management are the tapes that will over time continue to deteriorate? Why not grant someone with the expertise to attempt one final disc transfer from tapes that are still useable on the iconic albums like Exile... and Sticky Fingers?

The Doors management and even Elektra founder Jac Holzman once said the box it produced for Rhino was cut from a 192/24 bit transfer because the tapes were too fragile to use. Chad Kassem buzzed around their heads about the tapes, and finally when he buzzed with the correct amount of cash, out came the tapes. Compare the Rhino box, which sounds like the best CDs you've ever heard, to the Analogue Productions records, which sound like great sounding records and you wonder what still might be—if only on a few of these Stones albums.

I concluded the 2010 box set review with "Perhaps some day we’ll get another edition of Exile on Main St. mastered uncompressed from the original analog tapes by Chris Bellman at Bernie Grundman’s or by George Marino at Sterling or by Doug Sax at his facility.That’s a dream."

Of course now Marino and Sax are sadly gone and we still don't have that version of the album but we do have one here that has all of the original's slam and drive with much of the original's surprising three-dimensionality and detail (that only a really top front can can decipher) and one that without comparison to the original is damned enjoyable and doesn't sound as if it's struggling to escape a sonic box in which it's been put.

Everyone involved here did their best and the results are worthy of their efforts. The set rocks!

mauidj's picture

..for an absolutely brilliant essay.
Wow mate...you really out did yourself.
Looking forward to seeing them released individually....I hope.

bwright's picture

Thanks again for giving us the chance to compare files like this (via a rip from an astounding analog rig, no less), as it puts everything in perspective.

My two favorites were Tumbling Dice 1 and Start Me Up 2. Both had a slight edge in terms of vibrancy and realism.

firedog's picture

The original ABKCO Ludwig based SACDs sound great if you can get them. There are CDs and hi-res downloads based on them that also sound very good.

As far as Exile I still listen to my original pressing or a needle drop of it, but my needle drop isn't the best. My 70's LP hasn't been bettered, especially in digital - and I like good digital. That 40th Anniversary remaster is unlistenable, IMO.

Think there's any chance we will ever get a not compressed/squashed digital remaster of Exile? Maybe a hi-res audiophile version? I bet it would sell a fair amount.

Michael Fremer's picture
I think a needle drop from a clean Artisan original would beat anything else today. I’d make it and UMe would sell a ton of downloads!
Pretzel Logic's picture

I've had my fingers crossed for someone to pick up on the viability of HD needle drops. If you're making a digital copy anyway, why not go to a vinyl source that was manufactured from brand new tape? Anyone who spent time listening to your radio show knows...

F. Neves's picture

Michael, does the Artisan pressing beat the original UK release? I've got one of those thanks to my in law, who lived in London at the time of the release.

Michael Fremer's picture
After the overdubs were finished in LA Mick and Keith took the tapes to Artisan. Can’t grt much fresher and Artisan had a great chain. Not sure what was used for U.K. but wouldn’t be surprised to find Artisan stamp on it.
jkingtut's picture

Slogging through Discogs does reveal Artisan on UK 1st pressing. Just picked up Artisan US fp. $30. ebay

Martin's picture

They all sound great. I have two UKs....
The German first pressings were Artisan too, the best vinyl of the lot. Thick, high quality, quiet vinyl. Have acquired three or four of them over the years....

volvic's picture

I only listened to Tumbling Dice as I have for some reason, a visceral gut wrenching reaction to listening to Start Me Up, maybe it was overplayed when I was growing up, so will reserve my comments to TD. Prefer the second one, it is fuller sounding and easier on the ears. The first track might be cleaner but it is also brighter and slightly thinner sounding and hurt my ears a little. Track 2 of tumbling dice for me.

Anton D's picture

"...if you have an original Artisan Sound mastered copy of Exile..... you have the best."

Doesn't it make you wonder what turntable they used for their listening sessions that picked up all that cool stuff?

What did they use to play the lacquers?

What amps and speakers conveyed all that information?

In 1983, Undercover of the Night sounded its 'best.'

If the boys were hearing it, we need a history and shopping guide of what they were playing these platters on!

Endorsement time: I used this great article as an excuse to pick up the set.

Further side note: I used your article on Devialet's Lost recordings to get those and they now have some new sets out.

Tom L's picture


Martin's picture

Thanks Michael, for a really good review.
Enjoyed reading it. Records I know and love.

Perhaps you can say something specific about "Voodoo Lounge"? How does this version of Voodoo sound? Do you know if this was a 192/24 or 2.8 Mhz DSD transfer also.
I've always wondered if Voodoo was mixed digitally at 44.1/16. Although recorded analogue, the original LP was a 44.1/16 production. If that has been improved here, that would be great.

Do you or does anyone know if all this stuff will be available on HD Tracks anytime soon?
The high res. digital downloads I would jump for immediately.

The box? No way. With multiple copies of all the originals, the box is just plastic on the shelf.

Anyway, how can you beat Exile done at Artisan from fresh tapes? Black and Blue from Sterling? The Bob Ludwig cut of Tattoo You?

What I would jump for is a big box set of all the albums done AAA from the tapes, pressed at 45rpm. Like the Doors set. And why not, it's been done with the The Doors, Led Zeppelin, Bob Dylan....
The Stones catalogue, one last time, done all analogue, at 45rpm. That would be really cool.

JJK1954's picture

My only complaint is that it should have been a Flip Top box similar to the Beatles set. Its a little hard to slide a 10LB box back in. There was apparently a problem with UM, as the download card was not included. It is widespread. UM said they will send a link soon.

RubenH's picture

was notoriously compressed on the original CD.
How does the box's LP sound?
Thanks for a great review.

Puffer Belly's picture

...there is a 4 dB improvement between the original CD and LP. I would hope the new LP is as good as that or better.


nagysaudio's picture

I have early pressings of most of these albums and use an SME turntable. From my initial quick listen, most of these are the best I've heard and will be my go to records going forward.

With the exception of Sticky Fingers, Goats Head Soup, and It's Only Rock 'n Roll. All three lack impact and drive and are cut very low. But the originals were no better either, just different. I have so many versions of Sticky Fingers (including MOFI) that I couldn't even count them all.

Overall a fantastic set.

Roy Martin's picture

Sorry for the "threadjack," but for those who were intrigued by the Analog Planet 5/1/18 preview of the 5-disc Buffalo Springfield box, Music Direct has it for $114.99.

And Amazon has it for $64.25.

Your move.

Puffer Belly's picture

...that you say has the best sounding CDs you've ever heard: Is that The Complete Studio Recordings released in 1999, Perception released in 2006, or A Collection released in 2011?

JR465's picture

Hi Michael- Thanks for such a detailed review. One comment, by 1981 I think RL was at Masterdisk, not Sterling.

'And as long as we're at this, here are two excerpts from Tatoo You one from the original mastered by Bob Ludwig at Sterling Sound and one from the box'

Keep these reviews coming!

Best Regards

Michael Fremer's picture
Sorry. Brain fade. I fickst it.
JR465's picture

Hey, whadaya know, it is fickst!

fritzg's picture

How can one tell if a copy of Exile is an Artisan mastering? Too many options in discogs for me to decipher.

Michael Fremer's picture
Is a distinctive logo with an “A” in it. Sorry I can’t better describe it here...
jkingtut's picture

Somebody would have to sell it as an Artisan for you to know for sure. If you were in a record store the logo is very very tiny, like almost magnifying glass tiny. It is 2 concentric circles (inner to represent the spindle hole, the outer to represent a vinyl record along with the inner) and 2 straight lines that come out as a "V" from the center of the smaller circle and continue just enough past the curved line of the outer circle to form what could be considered a stylized "A" if looking from the right direction.

Martin's picture

I wonder if the Japanese single layer SHM-SACDs from a few years ago are the same transfers used for some of these LPs. For Tattoo You, Some Girls, Undercover, etc. Would not be surprised.
Those SHM-SACDs sound GREAT

Chipmanholmes's picture

Wondered why the 50th reissue sounded so bad (Now I know). I bought Exile on 8 track at a Grants department store when it came out when I was 14 (They mispriced it at a single album price and I was scared they were going to stop Me at the door. This being my favorite album ever I went and found my well played original vinyl copy and thanks to you I discovered that I have an Artisan Sound pressing and it still sounds amazing. I know it's a 1st pressing because when I bought it for 50 cents at a Salvation Army I also got the Doors LA Woman (Yellow transparent cover) and the Beatles (Yesterday and Today) covered Butcher cover (Which I steamed off...Hell I was 19 at the time). Someone must have died for these to be donated to a thrift store because the vinyl was in excellent condition and they all sound amazing. Anyway not a bad deal for $1.50 !

mauidj's picture

Thanks to this thread I just snagged an Artisan first pressing of Exhile on eBay. $39 for an ex rated copy. Very happy.
Good deal...........but not quite like yours!

hans altena's picture

Wished I had the money now to buy this and the desire to own all of Stones later catalogue, but it"s hard for me to look past Tattoo You (Voodoo Lounge I did admire, just as some of Undercover)and I already loathed Emotional Rescue, had little sympathy for It's only Rock'n Roll, so there you have it. But I do have interest for some of these albums to replace my old ones! I never was content with my German Artisan from 72, thin sounding, as if behind a cloud of hashies, like much of the seventies output in Europe, and the trouble of getting the cellar sound good for this ones is well known. The USA Artisans I bought new on travel seemed to come with scratches included from scratch! Now I read all the negativity on this beatiful site about the earlier half speed Exile, though nobody seemed to really have listened to it, not even you Michael, so I did not dare buy it. But now this box, which was too much for me, incited me to just try that single edition from Abbey Road's Exile from some years back, got it on amazon.de. And it blew me away!I do not hear the compression of the 2010 edition, but do get a lot of detail and the feeling you are in the room with them, with lots of dynamics, yes I like it more than all my old Artisans! It almost makes me doubt my judgement! For they used Marcussen's blighted files did they not? How could Showel get such a good result from that? Michael, do you have a clue?

hans altena's picture

Of course the analogue sound of the US Artisan can't be beat, but my copies are distorted too much, therefor my go to edition is now the one Showell made some years ago, and though he did not know it at that time, I am just guessing it was a flat transfer too, or Stephen just had not used too much compression for the tape, just added it when mastering the lot for the 2010 edition...