Lyra Kleos MC Cartridge Still A Smoothy After All These Years

The $2995 Lyra Kleos Cartridge was billed back in 2010 as a replacement for the Helikon. The Kleos is a much better sounding cartridge in every way. It maintains and actually ups the Helikon’s detail resolution, while adding the more expensive Skala’s smoothness and midband warmth.

Helikon fans will be delighted by the sonic upgrade while even Helikon detractors will drop their objections when they hear the Kleos (I heard from plenty of those after giving it a very positive review).

The Kleos weighs in at 8.8 grams (.8 more than the Helikon), the body machined from Duralumin, an aircraft-grade aluminum, with an attractive plated finish. Two press-fit specially tuned metal cylinders inserted into the body provide damping and resonance control. The Kleos is Lyra’s least expensive cartridge to include an Ogura .3mm diameter boron cantilever fitted with a Lyra spec’d low mass, 3x75 µm line contact stylus.

The new cartridge also includes Lyra’s “New Angle” dual neodymium disc magnet/coil alignment system that produces symmetrical flux lines during play instead of when the cartridge is at rest. For a visual representation go here.

Output is a substantial .5mV, internal impedance is 5.4 ohms and compliance is moderate. Because of the new coil/magnet alignment system the tracking force is tightly spec’d at between 1.7 and 1.8 grams, with 1.75 said to be optimum. Stick with the plan but I found slightly shy of 1.8 to be optimum, at least in the SME 309. The new design is extremely sensitive to VTF setting. When you’ve hit “the spot,” you’ll know it and it will be within the narrowly specified range. Loading ranged from between 100 ohms to 470 ohms depending upon the phono preamp used, but mostly I found 100 ohms ideal.

If you liked the Helikon’s speed and detail retrieval, you will be absolutely overjoyed by Kleos. Its out of the box performance was better than a fully broken in Helikon as well as a Helikon SL for that matter. Both are still great but the Kleos produced greater micro detail, while greatly ramping up midrange warmth and delicacy. Its overall tonal balance is decidedly more neutral and less on the cool side.

The Kleos produced a far more enticing tonal balance and its ability to course through the grooves silently complemented the turntable’s impressively quite backgrounds. Its tracking and tracing abilities, thanks to the long profile line contact stylus, were impressive, without regard to price, producing cleanly rendered sibilants and shimmering high frequency transients without a hint of edge or the cool overlay that turned off many to the Helikon.

Staging and imaging were exemplary. Expect a wide and deep stage populated by solid, three-dimensional images and don’t expect much in the way of mechanical artifacts, particularly if you get the SRA correctly set. The Kleos delivers fine, low level detail above an exceptionally low, dark noise floor.

The Kleos was smoothly and almost vividly balanced, with a firm grip on its well extended bottom end, a rich, generous but not cloying midrange and an airy, extended and decidedly not bright or etchy top end. Whatever negative preconceptions you may have about Lyra cartridges, you can toss them here while pocketing the good ones that dwell on speed, detail, high frequency extension and tracking excellence.

I didn’t have one here for a direct comparison, but based on what I remember, I think I like the Kleos better than the older, but more expensive Skala. I think it’s a better-balanced, more detailed cartridge. And while the Kleos can’t match the Titan’s resolving power or dynamic capabilities, I think the Kleos’ tonal balance is more neutral. Overall, I think Kleos is one of designer Jonathan Carr’s best effort yet and at a “reasonable” price point!

The Kleos was “highly recommended, without reservation” back in 2010. That is still true four years later.

kleinbje's picture

Have your heard the SL, running one now on a classic 3.  Wonderful to my ears, curious how it compares to titan , etna etc.  

andrewmorgan's picture

Mikey, you tempted us a while back saying you got an Etna from Lyra at a show, is a review imminent?

Michael Fremer's picture

Has been reviewed in Stereophile in my "Analog Corner" column. I will post it here shortly.

planarhead's picture

Michael would you mind saying which Lyra cartridges you found bright in the treble? Just as a frame of reference, I have only heard older Lyras.

Martin's picture

Would be very interested in the Etna review. I bought my Skala on Michaels review and reccomendation several years ago and have been very, very happy with it and how it combines with my setup. Which is tube based. 

The next cartridge I get will almost certainly be a Lyra and most likely the Etna. 

wadeh911's picture

recently upgraded my phono preamp to the JC3+ to gain ability to enjoy higher performance MC and MM cartridges and take advantage of a its variable cartridge loading features. Compared to my Dynavector 10X5 MC cartridge, will the Kleos offer a significant performance gain or should i look more up the Lyra line?

Brown Sunny's picture

Staging and imaging were exemplary. Expect a wide and deep stage populated by solid, three-dimensional images
Do you like pineapple or rambutan, do you like melon or orange, do you like strawberry or orange, or do children choose? Adults choose them all. The world of fruits in suika game has all kinds of fruits.

Amberr's picture

This recommendation is perfect for my device. Yes, The next cartridge I get will almost certainly be a Lyra and most likely the Etna. Well, You get more fun with Kasyno online with details here Of Course staging and imaging were exemplary.