Manley’s Magical Chinook MC/MM Phono Preamplifier

The Manley Chinook phono preamplifier is one of the most highly regarded, favorably reviewed phono stages on the market. A true hi-fi bargain in audiophile terms — a veritable giant killer, you might even say — we think it’s a perfect candidate for an AnalogPlanet review.

First up, I wanted to hear/review as many phono stages as possible, using my Tavish Audio Design Adagio, Luxman EQ-500, and Sutherland Little Loco phono stages for comparison. (For the record, the latter two are on loan.) I checked out a handful of new phono stages as seen in recent AnalogPlanet and Stereophile show coverage — but, to a fault, they were unavailable for further reportage. Enter Kevin Deal of Upscale Audio, one of the hardest-working, most enthusiastic hi-fi distributors in the States. When he offered up the Manley Chinook for review, we eagerly accepted.

The Manley Chinook is as plain a black box as exists in the world of phono stages. The front plate includes the Manley logo, Chinook derivation, and a blue-lit, LED pushbutton to power the unit. (In case you’re wondering — the Chinook doesn’t completely power down; it goes into sleep mode.) Its aluminum casework sports a crosshatched, mesh ventilation scheme. On the Chinook’s backside, you’ll find an IEC power receptacle, two pairs of Manley Teflon gold-plated RCA jacks for input and output, and a row of small dip switches that accommodate loading for MM and MC cartridges. Internally, low and high gain switches enable settings from 45dB to 60dB. “Typically,” states the manual, “45dB is for moving-magnet cartridges, and the 60dB setting is for moving-coil. Your Chinook comes factory set for 45dB gain.”

 0822.apreview.manleychinookback2.jpg

What are the differences between the Manley Chinook, which retails for $2,899*, and its newer SE Edition (also $2,899*), you may ask? “The standard Chinook has 45db and 60dB of gain, and a purple-ish faceplate,” Kevin Deal explained via email. “The Chinook SE has 45, 50, 60, and 65dB of gain, black or silver faceplate (along with standard color), and upgraded Gold Lion 6922 tubes that have been specially selected through testing as well as by ear and cryogenically treated.” [*Editor's note: The price of the Chinook has been revised to $3,199 for 2023 customers.]

I used low-output MC carts for this Chinook review, including an Ortofon SPU GE Classic MkII (0.2mV) and a Pure Fidelity Stratos (.45mV). I activated the 60dB gain bump available from two switches inside the Chinook, which produced excellent results.

The California-designed-and-manufactured Chinook offers tons of loading options via its back-panel dip switch array, making choice of resistive loading for my MC carts a breeze. Input impedance is enabled by user-selectable resistor values of 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 ohms. There are 32 possible loading scenarios in total.

Furthermore, “Input Termination Capacitance: 3-position user-selectable capacitor values of 50pF, 100pF, and 200pF yield resultant combinations of: 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, and 350pF,” according to the manual. “Use these settings typically for Moving Magnet (MM) cartridges. Default Input Impedance: 47k Ohms, with no other DIP switches selected. Use this setting typically for Moving Magnet (MM) cartridges.”

A tubed phono stage, the Chinook employs two 6922 tubes (gain stage) and two more 6922s (output stage). 6DJ8, 7308, ECC88 types may be substituted, if tube rolling is your thing.

 0822.apreview.manleychinookguts2.jpg

Power Up, and Listen On

On power up, the Chinook’s output jacks mute for 45 seconds. “Automatic mute circuit allows tubes to warm up and circuitry to settle,” notes the manual. “At power down, output jacks are immediately muted.”

Though you can use a SUT with the Chinook, I plugged in my carts — solo, as it were — to hear direct differences between the Manley and my in-house phono stages.

As the Chinook has been extensively reviewed elsewhere, I won’t get into the weeds of its build quality — which is exceptional, by the way — and instead will focus on its sound in my reviewer’s system, including the aforementioned phono stages. Turntables utilized for this review included Pure Fidelity Harmony and Thorens TD 1500 ’tables, joined to Ayre EX-8 or Parasound Halo 6 Hint integrated amplifiers, and DeVore Fidelity O/96 loudspeakers.

Straight out of the box, the Chinook exhibited a grand sense of orderliness and spaciousness — a very coherent, wide-open, and frequency-neutral phono stage. The Chinook may use tubes, but its neutrality is first rate. The Chinook presented a large, deep soundstage with excellent ambient cues and precisely focused images. It produced a large soundstage, similar to the Luxman EQ-500, another giant soundstage-producing machine. With the RSD release of Steely Dan’s Two Against Nature (Giant Records 603497849093), the Chinook drew deep low notes from bass drum and electric bass, which gilded my ears with excellent weight, robust tone, and visceral textures, though not as viscous (nor as wooly) as my Tavish Audio Design Adagio. (This review isn’t unfolding chronologically, per se, as I began comparison listening with the Luxman, followed by the Manley; then came the Tavish.)

The tubed Luxman EQ-500 is one of the most feature-rich phono stages available, with inputs for three turntables, on-the-fly adjustment dials for gain, impedance, capacitance, and choice of MM or MC cartridges. No dip switches required. Also available, toggle switches for phase, low and high cut, balanced or unbalanced inputs, mono/stereo, and a switch labeled “articulator.”

 0822.apreview.manleychinookguts3.jpg

The Luxman reproduced the treated piano discourses of Nils Frahm’s Felt (Erased Tapes Records ERATP033LP) with strong left-to-right separation and layering, with a consistent focus on upper-mid to treble frequencies — snare drums, airy ambient space, and prattling treated noises had a dazzling, burnished quality. The Luxman is a refined machine, leaving nothing to the imagination. Its resolution of ambient information aided its huge soundstage capabilities. Its rendering of Frahm’s treated piano was visceral, at times sounding like two seashells rubbed together.

Spaghetti western trio Kruangbin’s Mordechai (Dead Oceans DOC193LP) also benefitted from the Luxman’s delicacy and shading, the album’s gently played snare drum popping with just the right degree of light-wristed attack. The Luxman also rendered deep bass synth notes, as on dance duo Tosca’s Osam (!K7 Records K7411LP). The Luxman’s large stage was weighted by Tosca’s plentiful, at times, ominous synth bass tones, with touchable textures. (No, this isn’t a Luxman review, but it’s the Chinook’s competition in this review; that’s what it’s up against.)

The Luxman could occasionally sound less full or corporeal, as on ZZ Top’s Tres Hombres (London Records XPS 631), with Billy Gibbons’ guitars on the band’s signature track “La Grange” sounding smallish and faint. Instruments on Steely Dan’s Everything Must Go (Reprise Records 603497849109) sounded crisp and tight — but, occasionally, I heard more surface than body. The EQ-500 is a detail-retrieval king, has a humongous soundstage, a clear midrange, a healthy low-end, and gobs of air and atmosphere, as heard to great effect on “Trane’s Blues” from Workin’ With The Miles Davis Quintet (Prestige PRLP 7166). The EQ-500 excelled at classical and jazz, acoustic instruments beautifully portrayed.

The Manley Chinook was more like the EQ-500 than not, especially in its rendering of soundstage width and depth. But it dug deeper in midrange and bass, “Trane’s Blues” resounding with more natural high-hat and cymbal body, more distinct and slightly weightier upright bass, and a tad more immediacy overall. The Chinook didn’t separate instruments as well as the Luxman and had less interior definition, but it bettered the EQ-500 in top-to-bottom coherency and overall sense of flow. It played Steely Dan’s “Green Book” (also from the aforementioned Everything Must Go) with impressive rhythm section weight albeit on a smaller soundstage, with silkier guitars and better attack and weight from drummer Keith Carlock’s bass drum.

 0822.apreview.manleychinookmoreguts.jpg

The Manley was more laid-back than the Luxman and generally sounded creamier, with better low-end punch and weight overall. Where the Luxman was intricate and detailed, the Manley was more fleshed out. In that regard, the Chinook was similar to my Tavish Audio Design Adagio phono stage.

Speaking of, the Tavish Audio Design Adagio is an all-tube affair (three 5751, two 6267/EF86, one 12AU7A), with a separate solid-state power supply, and front-mounted dials for capacitance and resistance. It’s easy to operate, and there’s no denying its rich tube sound. It has the largest, most bloom-adorned soundstage of any phono stage I have in house, and it excels in saturated tone and low-end weight, but is nowhere as detailed, resolute, or coherent as either the Manley or the Luxman. The Tavish didn’t play “Trane’s Blues” as dramatically or dynamically as the Manley and had less bass drive. Its rendering of “Green Book” also lacked the punch and excitement of the Manley, which had more snap, drive, and tension.

The Manley strikes a good balance between all these preamplifiers, providing the flow and warmth of tubes with the coherency of the best solid state. (Unfortunately, I couldn’t compare the Chinook to the Sutherland Little Loco phono preamp, as I am currently without a low impedance, low output MC cart, a must for use with the very fine Little Loco.)

Conclusion

The Manley Chinook deserves all the praise it’s received by the audiophile press cognoscenti. At $3,199, it’s admittedly not cheap — but it’s worth saving up for. Its excellent coherency, neutrality, and resolution is balanced by excellent overall tone, spaciousness, and ability to sound very, good, no matter the genre of music. The giant killer lives!

For more information, head to the official Manley site. If you want to order a Chinook, go here.

Author bio: Former musician, former artist, and former legal wastrel Ken Micallef has written numerous hi-fi equipment reviews for Stereophile and AnalogPlanet, and his byline has also appeared within Mojo, Electronic Musician, and The Grammys. You can also find him at YouTube (Ken Micallef Jazz Vinyl Audiophile).

 0824.apreview.chinookupdate.jpg

Note: Manley Chinook image above updated August 24, 2022 to reflect proper faceplate.

COMMENTS
Tom L's picture

...but the Chinook has a big response jump at high frequencies.
https://www.hifinews.com/content/manley-chinook-phono-preamplifier-lab-r...
Otherwise an excellent phono preamp, and more affordable than many Manley products.

Jim Hagerman's picture

This is compensation for the Neuman pole at 50kHz, found in virtually all cutting head amplifiers. My phonostages do the same as well, restoring a bit of lost "airiness". This is not a bad thing, but good. Read more about it here:

http://www.hagtech.com/pdf/riaa.pdf

Tom L's picture

really exist?
http://www.pspatialaudio.com/neumann_pole.htm
Feel free to interpret this to me.

PeterPani's picture

the Manley works without a step-up transformer for even low MC's. Like they have done in the 60's. My experience is, this is the best way to play low MC's. Fully amplified by tubes.

JACK L's picture

Hi

No. From the picture showing the layout of the circuit board above, I can see an op-amp IC is used as the MC headamp. Not "fully amplified by tubes".

Yes, "Fully amplified by tubes" is technically possible but it will need a few more tubes to build up the MC headamp, with special cathode input stage topology to match the low low impedance of the MC cartridges.

Jack L

dial's picture

I don't know if the tubes are well suited to a phono input. But who knows?

JACK L's picture

Hi

Yes, tubes (triodes) are excellent for MM cartrdiges, sounding sooo much than using any solid state devices, IMO.

But for MC cartridges, it needs additional 20dB ++ to boost up the low low voltage output of any MCC, a popular way to obtain such extra gain is using
(1) a step-up transformer, or
(2) an active headamp using OP-amp IC, like the above preamp under review
or discrete bipolar junction devices, like FET/transistors.

FYI, the MC cartridge I am using now comes with its factory matched headamp built with discrete transistors in pure class A single-ended push-pull topology powered with +/- battery rails (to eliminate any AC power supply hum/noises for good !!). Both are same brandname made in Japan.

IMO, such pure class A solid state topology is second best next to a headamp using tubes assuming such tube headamps did exist commercially !!

Sonically & techically, it would outperform any step-up transformers which is limited in its high & low frequency due to the windings leakage capacitance & inductance. Phase distortion is always inherent in any audio transformers. Of course, high cost is another big issue to many MC users

Listening is believing

Jack L

vinylvalet's picture

Discrete transistor amplification precedes the tube amplification stage for MC cartridges. I believe even for high output MM cartridges in the low gain mode, the signal passes through the initial solid state gain stage.

PeterPani's picture

a noise floor, maybe a hum. But you can minimise this noise with proper setup. If you get the system silent (enough) pure valve amlpification beats step-ups and transistor imho. Step-ups might be a good choice, but good ones are very expensive ($3000+) and in truth some have to buy three or four sets, because cartridges to step-ups behaviour is very very sensitive and nearly impossible to get it that right a tube can easliy match. I was never satisfied with my combinations, it never sounded right. But every tube-setup I play for low MC's works without much hassle around. I get the same experience with my tape heads of my r2r-machines. Going straight into tube sounds always right, if the right circuit for vintage or new tapeheads is chosen. Step-ups are not silent, too...
Solid state is a matter of taste. I like my music fluid and not that authoritarian fascist over-accurat.

Tom L's picture

that transistors and accurate playback are "fascist".
Ya learn something every day.

PeterPani's picture

but it can be described, as hard edge in the sound that is not there, when listening to live music without amplification.

JACK L's picture

Hi

YES. nothing can match live ACOUSTICAL music performance when the live music goes straight to our ears, soooo real sooo enjoyable sooo engaging.

Why? Music does not like fighting its way through any electronics ! More electronics, more "hard edge in the sound".

Listening to live music is believing

JACK L

JACK L's picture

Hi

No. When MM input is selected, the "initial solid state gain stage" will be totally bypassed.

The initial solid state gain stage is designed exclusively with average 26dB gain for MC which delivers very low output voltage, e.g. 0.1mV for Ortofon MC10II, & very low load impedance, 10ohm for same cartridge.

MM cartridge is a totally different thing vs a MC cartridge! Much higer output voltage, typically 4-5mV, & load of 47KR.

But if you ask me which sounds more musical, MC or MM, I prefer MM which sounds more muscically natural & 'human' to my ears.

Listening is believing

Jack L

vinylvalet's picture

You're just not told about it unless purchased through Upscale. Open up any recent Chinook and the gain jumpers should be obvious.

Carceses's picture

Thanks to Neuman Pole for sharing http://www.hagtech.com/pdf/riaa.pdfduck life

pbj5555's picture

A I missing something? Was there supposed to be a comparison to the Sutherland Little Loco in this review somewhere? I sure can’t find it…

Kaylanicole's picture

I also want to lean these complexities how you explain all the board etc https://www.manley.com/hifi/mchnick

lgfreezer's picture

How much this device cost? https://trackingangle.com/Cerca

X